- 24 would be below the poverty level
- 76 would be above
- 29 would be white
- 25 would be black
- 42 would be Hispanic
- 3 would be Asian
- 1 would be Other
- 9 travel less than 10 minutes to work
- 30 travel 10-19 minutes to work
- 23 travel 20-29 minutes to work
- 25 travel 30-44 minutes to work
- 13 travel 45 or more minutes to work
- 16 less than $15,000 in household income/benefits
- 26 $15,000 to $34,999 in household income/benefits
- 15 $35,000 to $49,999 in household income/benefits
- 17 $50,000 to $74,999 in household income/benefits
- 9 $75,000 to $99,999 in household income/benefits
- 9 $100,000 to $149,999 in household income/benefits
- 10 $150,000 or more in household income/benefits
- 39 with private health insurance
- 21 with public health insurance
- 31 no health insurance
- 9 other health insurance coverage
- 30 own home with mortgage
- 14 own home free and clear
- 56 rent
- DISD students: 70 Hispanic, 5 white, 23 black
- 85 DISD students economically disadvantaged
- 15 DISD students not economically disadvantaged
- 58 speak only English at home
- 38 speak only Spanish at home
- 2 speak other Indo-European languages at home
- 2 speak Asian and Pacific Island languages at home
- 1 speaks other language
- 14 less than 9th grade education
- 12 high school but didn't graduate
- 22 high school graduate
- 18 some college but no degree
- 9 associate's degree
- 18 bachelor's degree
- 11 graduate degree or higher
- 38 Evangelicals
- 14 Mainline Protestants
- 7 Historically black Protestant
- 15 Catholics
- 7 Other faiths
- 18 Unaffiliated
- 77 drive alone
- 11car pool
- 4 public transportation
- 2 walk
- 1 Bicycle
- taxi, motorcycle or other
- 4 work at home
- 83 work in Dallas County
- 17 work outside Dallas County
Showing posts with label public policy and equity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public policy and equity. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 01, 2015
100
If Dallas were 100 people. . .
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Sanity!
Judge Rules School Finance System Unconstitutional, Case Heads to Texas Supreme Court
by Patrick Michels Published on
Just before breaking for lunch today, Travis County District Judge John Dietz joked that it was appropriate the last day of the school finance trial fell so close to Groundhog Day. Like him, many of the lawyers making their closing arguments today had been through this before in at least one of the six previous school finance cases against the state since 1984.
This afternoon, Dietz issued his ruling—again, a repeat of many school finance rulings issued from the Travis County Courthouse—that Texas’ system for funding its schools is inadequate, unfair and creates a de facto statewide property tax. As a broad coalition of school districts spent 44 days arguing in court, each of those means the finance system violates the Texas Constitution.
And now, just as in those six previous cases—known colloquially and at really wild parties as Edgewood I-IV and West Orange-Cove I and II—it’s up to the Texas Supreme Court to make the final call. If the Supreme Court agrees with Dietz, it’ll be up to the Legislature to “fix” the system to their satisfaction, a whole ‘nother messy procedure that could mean special legislative sessions and new trials to see if the new system passes muster with the courts. (Hence the previous cases’ Rocky-esque names.)
The latest case, likely to be remembered as Fort Bend ISD v. Texas Education Agency (or, God forbid, Fort Bend I), brought together more than 600 districts representing three-quarters of the students in the state—the largest school finance case Texas has ever seen.
This case isn’t just the biggest one Texas has ever seen, but the most complex as well, thanks to a pair of groups that joined the case with arguments that hadn’t been raised in school finance trials before. The Texas Charter School Association and TREE (Texans for Real Efficiency and Equity in Education, if you’re long-winded about it) argued for more charter schools, more money for charter schools, and a guarantee that schools spend their money wisely. Today Dietz ruled against both groups, saying the issues they raised are best left to the Legislature.
Dietz was more sympathetic to the central argument raised by school districts in varying forms: that lawmakers had raised standards for Texas schools—specifically by rolling out the new, tougher STAAR test—just when they were cutting funding from public education.
“We either want increased standards, and are willing to pay the price, or we don’t,” Dietz said today.
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Beyond charity, building justice into systems
“On the one hand we are called to play the good Samaritan on life's roadside; but that will be only an initial act. One day we must come to see that the whole Jericho road must be transformed so that men and women will not be constantly beaten and robbed as they make their journey on life's highway. True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it is not haphazard and superficial. It comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring."
From a sermon entitled "A Time to Break Silence," at Riverside Church”
― Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Monday, January 24, 2011
Tough times. . .multiplying needs. . .deep cuts
No one need remind us really that we find ourselves in the midst of tough times. Especially hard hit has been the public sector. Even in relatively prosperous states like Texas with comparatively low unemployment, local and state governments face huge budget deficits. Elected officials struggle to balance budgets while embroiled in ideological battles of public policy and spending.
In my view, we cut some things to our own peril. Being penny wise and pound foolish will eventually catch up with us as a city, a state and a nation. And, never forget, all of this come right down to the individual census tract and, even closer to home, the block where I live.
The following report from The New York Times caught my attention. It provides a good overview of what cities face,including even bankruptcy!
Read the report and then let me know your thinking. Solutions?
Mayors See No End to Hard Choices for Cities
By MICHAEL COOPER
Published: January 21, 2011
WASHINGTON — Despite having one of the highest crime rates in the nation, Camden, N.J., laid off nearly half its police force this week after failing to win concessions from its unions. On the other side of the country, Vallejo, Calif., was filing a bankruptcy plan that proposed paying some creditors as little as a nickel or 20 cents on each dollar they are owed.
Mayors outside the White House on Thursday included, from left, Mick Cornett of Oklahoma City, Michael A. Nutter of Philadelphia, Antonio R. Villaraigosa of Los Angeles and Michael B. Coleman of Columbus, Ohio.
These are hard times for cities, and the mood was grim as more than 200 mayors gathered here this week for the winter meeting of the United States Conference of Mayors.
Many mayors have already raised taxes, cut services and laid off workers, even police and firefighters. Now they are girding themselves for more tough times, as falling home values are belatedly showing up in property tax assessments, and struggling states are threatening to cut aid to cities.
“I came in full of idealism — I was going to change my city,” said Mayor Bill Finch of Bridgeport, Conn., who has laid off 160 workers. “You get involved in government because you want to do more for the people, you want to show them that government can work and local government, by and large, really does work for the people — directly, you can’t hide. But then you say you’ve got to pay the same amount of taxes, and you’re going to get less.”
Some mayors said that they expected more cities, mostly smaller cities, to seek bankruptcy or possibly even default on their loans as the downturn grinds on, though municipal analysts see defaults as unlikely.
In interviews, mayors spoke about their efforts to keep their cities afloat by raising taxes, consolidating services, selling off city assets and shrinking their work forces.
Many of them, including Democrats who have been historically close to unions, said they were taking aim at public pensions, which they said were no longer affordable.
“That’s not a Democrat or Republican issue,” said Mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa of Los Angeles, a Democrat who is supporting measures that would lower the cost of pensions for new police officers and firefighters and require employees to contribute toward the cost of their retirement health benefits. “The fact is, our pensions aren’t sustainable.”
To read the entire report click here.
In my view, we cut some things to our own peril. Being penny wise and pound foolish will eventually catch up with us as a city, a state and a nation. And, never forget, all of this come right down to the individual census tract and, even closer to home, the block where I live.
The following report from The New York Times caught my attention. It provides a good overview of what cities face,including even bankruptcy!
Read the report and then let me know your thinking. Solutions?
Mayors See No End to Hard Choices for Cities
By MICHAEL COOPER
Published: January 21, 2011
WASHINGTON — Despite having one of the highest crime rates in the nation, Camden, N.J., laid off nearly half its police force this week after failing to win concessions from its unions. On the other side of the country, Vallejo, Calif., was filing a bankruptcy plan that proposed paying some creditors as little as a nickel or 20 cents on each dollar they are owed.
Mayors outside the White House on Thursday included, from left, Mick Cornett of Oklahoma City, Michael A. Nutter of Philadelphia, Antonio R. Villaraigosa of Los Angeles and Michael B. Coleman of Columbus, Ohio.
These are hard times for cities, and the mood was grim as more than 200 mayors gathered here this week for the winter meeting of the United States Conference of Mayors.
Many mayors have already raised taxes, cut services and laid off workers, even police and firefighters. Now they are girding themselves for more tough times, as falling home values are belatedly showing up in property tax assessments, and struggling states are threatening to cut aid to cities.
“I came in full of idealism — I was going to change my city,” said Mayor Bill Finch of Bridgeport, Conn., who has laid off 160 workers. “You get involved in government because you want to do more for the people, you want to show them that government can work and local government, by and large, really does work for the people — directly, you can’t hide. But then you say you’ve got to pay the same amount of taxes, and you’re going to get less.”
Some mayors said that they expected more cities, mostly smaller cities, to seek bankruptcy or possibly even default on their loans as the downturn grinds on, though municipal analysts see defaults as unlikely.
In interviews, mayors spoke about their efforts to keep their cities afloat by raising taxes, consolidating services, selling off city assets and shrinking their work forces.
Many of them, including Democrats who have been historically close to unions, said they were taking aim at public pensions, which they said were no longer affordable.
“That’s not a Democrat or Republican issue,” said Mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa of Los Angeles, a Democrat who is supporting measures that would lower the cost of pensions for new police officers and firefighters and require employees to contribute toward the cost of their retirement health benefits. “The fact is, our pensions aren’t sustainable.”
To read the entire report click here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)