When Central Dallas Ministries and the Central Dallas Community Development Corporation moved into developing permanent housing for formerly homeless people most people applauded our efforts and our decision. All of the national research indicated that providing a permanent place for homeless persons to live had dramatic impact on the success and personal stabilzation of the individuals involved.
As I say, most everyone supported our efforts.
Most, but not all.
The CityWalk@ Akard project was our first.
[BTW--The grand opening will be this evening from 4:30 p.m. until 7:00 p.m. Even though the building is not quite finished, it will be a grand party. Mayor Tom Leppert will speak. Our district's Council Member Angela Hunt will speak. Other city leaders and supporters of the project will join us. If you are in Dallas, come on down!]
And not everyone was happy about our plans to develop housing for low-income and formerly homeless tenants.
Some business leaders expressed concerns. Everyone maintained their civility, but many discussed the project with us in rather foreboding terms.
Among those expressing reservations, and in some cases downright fear, were parents and leaders at a nearby private school.
We worked closely with the school group, even including one of their leaders on our community advisory board. As we worked through the project, the group's initial opposition waned.
Of course, in the beginning the group expressed concerns for the safety of the children attending the school because of the presence of low-income and formerly homeless residents in our building.
While, as a parent and grandparent, I understand those feelings, beneath these concerns lurks a real bias, an ill-informed bias and a fear that in the vast majority of cases is totally misplaced.
Then, earlier this week I received a copy of the following AP report from my dear friend and pastor, Dr. John Fiedler. John stood with us in his church (First United Methodist) just around the corner from City Walk and spoke boldly for our project. He repeated his statement of support before the entire City Council.
John sent this news report to point up where the real danger may be today when it comes to school children and the extremely poor.
Read it and let me know what you think.
2 Philly kids face charges in random-attack game
Mar 23 02:35 PM US/Eastern
PHILADELPHIA (AP) - Two preteens assaulted a woman walking home through a playground as part of a violent game called "Catch and Wreck," in which children identify targets they think are homeless and then beat and rob them for fun, police said Tuesday.
An 11-year-old boy was arrested Monday night and charged with aggravated assault, conspiracy and robbery, Philadelphia police Lt. John Walker said.
A 12-year-old girl was charged shortly after the Friday night attack in southwest Philadelphia. The victim was surrounded by children, then punched and hit with sticks, police said. She suffered minor injuries to her knee and head and delayed seeking medical attention to help police with the investigation.
Police also plan to charge the boy in an attack on a 73-year-old man who was beaten and robbed in the same area on March 13, Walker said. The victim in that assault, Vincent Poppa, suffered a heart attack and remains hospitalized.
A spokeswoman for District Attorney Seth Williams said both children were being charged as juveniles. Their names have not been released.
Investigators believe the assaults are part of a game called "Catch and Wreck," which children in the neighborhood described to them after Friday's attack.
Children told police the game involves pinpointing passers-by they think are homeless and then beating and robbing them for fun, Walker said. The woman who was attacked, however, said she is not homeless.
"We're just hoping it's isolated and that (these arrests) will quickly bring it to a halt," he said.
Deputy Commissioner Richard Ross, who oversees all field operations for the department, said the recent reports of "Catch and Wreck" were the first the department had gotten.
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Food Stamps and Farmer's Markets
Here's another great post from Good.is.
Tell me what you think?
Any ideas for a solution?
Help devise a system for using food stamps to buy better produce.
We all can agree that fresh fruits and vegetables are an essential part of good health. Yet access to fresh produce remains an enormous challenge. For people on food stamps, it’s an especially difficult one as there are few supermarkets in low income neighborhoods with sufficient offerings. Even thought more farmers’ markets are springing up across the country—and more than 750 farmers’ markets nationwide accept food stamps—other challenges remain.
Foodstamps, of course, are no longer physical stamps but “electronic benefit transfer” cards (or EBTs). This has helped remove the stigma for recipients of aid—and makes shopping at supermarkets easier—but has left farmers’ markets in a tough spot: without a battery-powered wireless card reader, food-stamp recipients can't use their EBT cards. The lack of this simple machine is keeping people from buying fresh food. Many farmers are unable to afford the cost of the equipment (about $1,100 per reader) required to accept the debit cards; others feel the paperwork and record keeping is onerous.
Some (but not all) states have agreed to fund programs to facilitate the use of food stamps at farmers’ markets. Vendors can use hand-held devices, and in some cases cell phones, to process transactions. Other markets, like San Francisco’s Alemany Market, allow EBT card users to exchange their credit for market-specific tokens that can be used at individual booths, but the extra step required has resulted in a drop off in use of food stamps at farmers’ markets.
All of which begs the question: how can we make food stamps easier to use and to accept at farmers’ markets?
the OBJECTIVE
Make it easy to use and accept food stamps at farmers’ markets.
the ASSIGNMENT
Invent a low cost, easy to implement solution. Is it an app? Centralized check-out? Delivery? Something totally low tech? Barter? Trade? Let us know.
the REQUIREMENTS
Post a comment, tweet @GOOD, or e-mail projects[at]goodinc[dot]com with your solution to the problem of how to accept food stamps at farmers' markets. Your response can take the form of a sentence, a paragraph, a sketch, an annotated photo—whatever you think will best convey your idea. Deadline is Monday, March 29.
To check this site click here.
Tell me what you think?
Any ideas for a solution?
Help devise a system for using food stamps to buy better produce.
We all can agree that fresh fruits and vegetables are an essential part of good health. Yet access to fresh produce remains an enormous challenge. For people on food stamps, it’s an especially difficult one as there are few supermarkets in low income neighborhoods with sufficient offerings. Even thought more farmers’ markets are springing up across the country—and more than 750 farmers’ markets nationwide accept food stamps—other challenges remain.
Foodstamps, of course, are no longer physical stamps but “electronic benefit transfer” cards (or EBTs). This has helped remove the stigma for recipients of aid—and makes shopping at supermarkets easier—but has left farmers’ markets in a tough spot: without a battery-powered wireless card reader, food-stamp recipients can't use their EBT cards. The lack of this simple machine is keeping people from buying fresh food. Many farmers are unable to afford the cost of the equipment (about $1,100 per reader) required to accept the debit cards; others feel the paperwork and record keeping is onerous.
Some (but not all) states have agreed to fund programs to facilitate the use of food stamps at farmers’ markets. Vendors can use hand-held devices, and in some cases cell phones, to process transactions. Other markets, like San Francisco’s Alemany Market, allow EBT card users to exchange their credit for market-specific tokens that can be used at individual booths, but the extra step required has resulted in a drop off in use of food stamps at farmers’ markets.
All of which begs the question: how can we make food stamps easier to use and to accept at farmers’ markets?
the OBJECTIVE
Make it easy to use and accept food stamps at farmers’ markets.
the ASSIGNMENT
Invent a low cost, easy to implement solution. Is it an app? Centralized check-out? Delivery? Something totally low tech? Barter? Trade? Let us know.
the REQUIREMENTS
Post a comment, tweet @GOOD, or e-mail projects[at]goodinc[dot]com with your solution to the problem of how to accept food stamps at farmers' markets. Your response can take the form of a sentence, a paragraph, a sketch, an annotated photo—whatever you think will best convey your idea. Deadline is Monday, March 29.
To check this site click here.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
So, history can be "managed," can't it?
Last week the Texas State Board of Education adopted a textbook content plan for all social studies students in the state of Texas. You can read the report on the Board's action published in The Dallas Morning News here.
The article and, even more, the actions of the board drive home a point about the writing of history that seems to escape many of us.
History is always interpretation.
The notion of historical fact remains largely mythological by definition. At best, history is the craft of cobbling together various sources into a story that then can expect to be challenged by other historians with additional sources and new interpretations. This process of give and take, peer review and intellectual refinement and debate is the stuff of the profession. It provides cause for conventions and symposiums and professional meetings. It provides content for various historical journals. In the battle we discover the professional concerns of serious historians. Of course, non-historians can enter the fray as well, as evidenced by the action of the Board of Education whose actions were admittedly more political than historic in any sense.
Still, there is no such thing as an objective historical narrative or the definitive version of any historical event, period or epoch that we can rely on without healthy skepticism or continuing challenge.
Further, the historian's own social context, her own life history, his educational experiences and her personal values all will enter the process of "doing history." Great historians labor to overcome the adverse affects of outside influences, but pure interpretative analysis just doesn't happen. Sources must be chosen, evaluated, reject or included. The result: the latest historical interpretation to be read, appreciated and critiqued for the good of an on-going quest for better, more complete understandings.
Historians like John B. Boles, Howard Zinn and David McCullough, to name only three, know (in Zinn's case, sadly, "knew") this reality. Historians spend their lives working their sources to discover and craft a story that we can dig into, gain insight from and use in the living of our own lives.
While the recent actions of our State Board of Education leave an awful lot to be desired when it comes to the source choices they made, it should not surprise us that they chose. That's just want historians do. Even non-historians, like our state Board of Education, make such choices, in this most recent case with a political and value agenda to promote.
Speaking of choices and sources, be sure and read what my partner Rev. Gerald Britt wrote about the Texas textbook plan. I think you'll appreciate the choices he makes and the story he tells. To read what he has to say click here.
The article and, even more, the actions of the board drive home a point about the writing of history that seems to escape many of us.
History is always interpretation.
The notion of historical fact remains largely mythological by definition. At best, history is the craft of cobbling together various sources into a story that then can expect to be challenged by other historians with additional sources and new interpretations. This process of give and take, peer review and intellectual refinement and debate is the stuff of the profession. It provides cause for conventions and symposiums and professional meetings. It provides content for various historical journals. In the battle we discover the professional concerns of serious historians. Of course, non-historians can enter the fray as well, as evidenced by the action of the Board of Education whose actions were admittedly more political than historic in any sense.
Still, there is no such thing as an objective historical narrative or the definitive version of any historical event, period or epoch that we can rely on without healthy skepticism or continuing challenge.
Further, the historian's own social context, her own life history, his educational experiences and her personal values all will enter the process of "doing history." Great historians labor to overcome the adverse affects of outside influences, but pure interpretative analysis just doesn't happen. Sources must be chosen, evaluated, reject or included. The result: the latest historical interpretation to be read, appreciated and critiqued for the good of an on-going quest for better, more complete understandings.
Historians like John B. Boles, Howard Zinn and David McCullough, to name only three, know (in Zinn's case, sadly, "knew") this reality. Historians spend their lives working their sources to discover and craft a story that we can dig into, gain insight from and use in the living of our own lives.
While the recent actions of our State Board of Education leave an awful lot to be desired when it comes to the source choices they made, it should not surprise us that they chose. That's just want historians do. Even non-historians, like our state Board of Education, make such choices, in this most recent case with a political and value agenda to promote.
Speaking of choices and sources, be sure and read what my partner Rev. Gerald Britt wrote about the Texas textbook plan. I think you'll appreciate the choices he makes and the story he tells. To read what he has to say click here.
Monday, March 22, 2010
Texas Big Winner in Health Care Reform. . .
This from the Center for Public Policy Priorities following the passage of the health care reform bill on Sunday night in the U. S. House of Representatives:
TEXANS ARE AMONG THE BIGGEST WINNERS IN LAST NIGHT’S VOTE FOR HISTORIC HEALTH CARE REFORM
Texans are among the biggest winners in last night’s historic vote by the U.S. House of Representatives to enact fundamental health care system reforms. With more than one in four Texans currently lacking health care insurance and runaway premiums adding daily to that 6.1 million count, relief cannot not come too soon for our overburdened health care system. In addition to providing new economic security to millions of Texas families, the national health reform bill will also bring billions of dollars back to Texas each year through health insurance tax credits for middle class and low-income Texans, and Medicaid coverage for our poorest citizens.
“Medicaid expansion to cover working poor parents of children on Texas Medicaid today will be 100 percent federally funded for three years, with the state getting nine federal dollars for each state dollar from 2020 on forward said CPPP associate director Anne Dunkelberg. “Twice as many now-uninsured Texans will gain coverage by purchasing affordable private insurance through the new Health Insurance Exchange as will gain Medicaid, bringing even more federal dollars to Texas with no state matching dollars required.”
This reform keeps in place our large and robust private insurance and health care delivery sector, while filling the gaps that have left too many Texans lacking care or overwhelmed by debt. Our state leadership should move promptly and in good faith to facilitate the implementation of health insurance reforms. Texans can look to the establishment of the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and our response to Hurricane Ike as recent examples of the excellent performance of which our state government is capable when it has the backing of leadership.
Providing equal access to affordable health care will remove a crippling barrier to real equality of opportunity for Texans and Americans. CPPP applauds Congress for taking this long-overdue step forward. We pledge to help Texans learn about this legislation, and about what we need to do here in Texas to ensure the maximum benefits of reform for our citizens.
The Center for Public Policy Priorities (CPPP) is a non-profit, non-partisan policy institute dedicated to improving economic and social conditions of low- and moderate-income Texans.
TEXANS ARE AMONG THE BIGGEST WINNERS IN LAST NIGHT’S VOTE FOR HISTORIC HEALTH CARE REFORM
Texans are among the biggest winners in last night’s historic vote by the U.S. House of Representatives to enact fundamental health care system reforms. With more than one in four Texans currently lacking health care insurance and runaway premiums adding daily to that 6.1 million count, relief cannot not come too soon for our overburdened health care system. In addition to providing new economic security to millions of Texas families, the national health reform bill will also bring billions of dollars back to Texas each year through health insurance tax credits for middle class and low-income Texans, and Medicaid coverage for our poorest citizens.
“Medicaid expansion to cover working poor parents of children on Texas Medicaid today will be 100 percent federally funded for three years, with the state getting nine federal dollars for each state dollar from 2020 on forward said CPPP associate director Anne Dunkelberg. “Twice as many now-uninsured Texans will gain coverage by purchasing affordable private insurance through the new Health Insurance Exchange as will gain Medicaid, bringing even more federal dollars to Texas with no state matching dollars required.”
This reform keeps in place our large and robust private insurance and health care delivery sector, while filling the gaps that have left too many Texans lacking care or overwhelmed by debt. Our state leadership should move promptly and in good faith to facilitate the implementation of health insurance reforms. Texans can look to the establishment of the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and our response to Hurricane Ike as recent examples of the excellent performance of which our state government is capable when it has the backing of leadership.
Providing equal access to affordable health care will remove a crippling barrier to real equality of opportunity for Texans and Americans. CPPP applauds Congress for taking this long-overdue step forward. We pledge to help Texans learn about this legislation, and about what we need to do here in Texas to ensure the maximum benefits of reform for our citizens.
The Center for Public Policy Priorities (CPPP) is a non-profit, non-partisan policy institute dedicated to improving economic and social conditions of low- and moderate-income Texans.
Inequality and illness. . .
Good.is happens to be one of those.
Don't know how I missed it for so long.
You can check out the home page here.
What follows was "Post of the Week" for March 6-12, 2010.
GOOD Blog > Andrew Price on March 6, 2010 at 5:39 am PST
Given that income inequality in the United States is pretty bad (see map), this interview with the epidemiologist Richard Wilkinson is especially interesting. Wilkinson has found that high levels of income inequality correspond to all sorts of social problems. In other words, it isn't having more, but sharing more, that makes a community healthier.
"...we looked at life expectancy, mental illness, teen birthrates, violence, the percent of populations in prison, and drug use. They were all not just a little bit worse, but much worse, in more unequal countries. ... Epidemiologists and people working in public health have been doing this work for some time, not only controlling for relative poverty, but for all the income levels within, for instance, an American state. So once you know the relationship between income and death rates, for example, you should be able to predict what a state's death rate will be. Actually, though, that doesn't produce a good prediction; what matters aren't the incomes themselves but how unequal they are. If you're a more unequal state, the same level of income produces a higher death rate."
Wilkinson's explanation? In countries with more income inequality there is fiercer competition for status, and that leads to higher stress, more crime, less trust, and a host of other socially corrosive phenomena.
To check out this site click here.
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Spring interrupted!
Sunday morning, March 21, 2010, greeted Dallas, Texas with a message of beauty, hope and surprise! Sure, the cold weather created a few travel concerns, but the wonder of the snow seemed worth it.
One more time, lest we forget, before the arrival of another hot summer.
I love it!
One more time, lest we forget, before the arrival of another hot summer.
I love it!
A clear word on Sunday morning in the midst of Lent. . .
Isaiah 10:1-4. . .
Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppressive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people, making widows their prey and robbing the fatherless.
What will you do on the day of reckoning, when disaster comes from afar? To whom will you run for help? Where will you leave your riches? Nothing will remain but to cringe among the captives or fall among the slain. Yet for all this, his anger is not turned away, his hand is still upraised.
Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppressive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people, making widows their prey and robbing the fatherless.
What will you do on the day of reckoning, when disaster comes from afar? To whom will you run for help? Where will you leave your riches? Nothing will remain but to cringe among the captives or fall among the slain. Yet for all this, his anger is not turned away, his hand is still upraised.
Saturday, March 20, 2010
Friday, March 19, 2010
Side-By-Side Comparison Tool for Health Reform Bill
The Kaiser Family Foundation provides a very helpful "side-by-side" comparison tool for the House and Senate versions of the current health care reform legislation that may be voted on this Sunday.
Check it out here.
Check it out here.
Children lead the way on Census 2010 in Dallas!
Central Dallas Ministries
511 N. Akard St., Suite 302
Dallas, Texas 75201
Contact: Stacy Olds (214) 823–8710
Next Generation Urges Census Participation
DALLAS – A crew of elementary and middle school kids will knock on doors in their East Dallas housing community during spring break on Friday, March 19, encouraging neighbors to participate in the 2010 U.S. Census.
The youngsters will tell families in the Roseland community to “take 10 minutes to fill out 10 questions that will influence the next 10 years of your lives.”
The students will be knocking on doors between 10 and 11 a.m. on Friday March 19.
Their effort is an educational community-building step by Central Dallas Ministries to join the city of Dallas in making the latest census count as accurate as possible.
“Kids tend to get our attention,” said Gerald Britt, vice president of public policy for Central Dallas Ministries. “We hope the message they bring will convince the community that participating in the census count is good for everyone. It can bring health care services, schools, college grants, roads and other critically needed services to people.”
Enlightening young people on the census is another goal, Britt said. “This whole week, we taught the kids at Roseland about the Census – what it is, when and how it will be completed, and why it matters so much. We hope that, when they become adults, they will tell their kids about the Census, too.”
Immigration reform. . .now
I like what Jim Wallis writes in the latest on-line edition of Sojourners. Lend him your attention for a few moments. Then consider what you could do to join the movement to bring comprehensive reform to our immigration situation.
Pray Immigration Reform Into Passage
On Sunday, a major march for immigration reform will take place in Washington, D.C. Tens of thousands of people will gather to call on the White House to lead, and put forward an immigration reform bill whose time has come. We will march and we will pray. And the following morning, a high-level delegation of religious leaders will meet with key White House officials to press the same message. There are both Democrats and Republicans who in the past have said they supported comprehensive immigration reform, and so there ought now to be bipartisan support for such a bill. But in the ultra-partisan and poisoned atmosphere of the U.S. Congress now, bipartisan spirit has fled the halls of power. In Washington, politics is now just a game of win and lose, and it’s only about the next election; the process of politics in the nation’s capital is no longer about solving problems. But the problem is that there are children and families in the balance, and the politicians are now playing politics with the lives of vulnerable people. Those people are our brothers and sisters, they are our parishioners, and they are children of God. And the faith community has come together to say the time for politics over compassion is over.
The number of deportations in this administration’s first year is higher than previous years, meaning more broken lives, more families torn apart. That is not what we meant by change. Read the entire essay here.
[I know he has been busy on the economy, health care reform and other important matters, but possibly one thing you and I can do is write President Obama and challenge him to deliver on his campaign promise to bring forward a plan for comprehensive immigration reform ASAP. LJ]
Pray Immigration Reform Into Passage
On Sunday, a major march for immigration reform will take place in Washington, D.C. Tens of thousands of people will gather to call on the White House to lead, and put forward an immigration reform bill whose time has come. We will march and we will pray. And the following morning, a high-level delegation of religious leaders will meet with key White House officials to press the same message. There are both Democrats and Republicans who in the past have said they supported comprehensive immigration reform, and so there ought now to be bipartisan support for such a bill. But in the ultra-partisan and poisoned atmosphere of the U.S. Congress now, bipartisan spirit has fled the halls of power. In Washington, politics is now just a game of win and lose, and it’s only about the next election; the process of politics in the nation’s capital is no longer about solving problems. But the problem is that there are children and families in the balance, and the politicians are now playing politics with the lives of vulnerable people. Those people are our brothers and sisters, they are our parishioners, and they are children of God. And the faith community has come together to say the time for politics over compassion is over.
The number of deportations in this administration’s first year is higher than previous years, meaning more broken lives, more families torn apart. That is not what we meant by change. Read the entire essay here.
[I know he has been busy on the economy, health care reform and other important matters, but possibly one thing you and I can do is write President Obama and challenge him to deliver on his campaign promise to bring forward a plan for comprehensive immigration reform ASAP. LJ]
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Project Access update. . .
Central Dallas Ministries helped create Project Access Dallas in 2001-2002 to serve uninsured, working people in Dallas who don't qualify for public health benefits.
Dr. Jim Walton, the medical director for the project, recently prepared an update report on the effort. To read Jim's report click here.
Dr. Jim Walton, the medical director for the project, recently prepared an update report on the effort. To read Jim's report click here.
The Go Giver
If you haven't read The Go-Giver, you need to check it out!
The principles apply in business, but also across the board generally for all aspects of life.
My friend and partner, Dr. Jim Walton gave me a copy for my birthday this year. Thanks, Dr. Jim! Great, inspirational read. Not so much a new message, but packaged so well in a story that pulls you along to the next page.
The principles apply in business, but also across the board generally for all aspects of life.
My friend and partner, Dr. Jim Walton gave me a copy for my birthday this year. Thanks, Dr. Jim! Great, inspirational read. Not so much a new message, but packaged so well in a story that pulls you along to the next page.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
St. Patrick's Day and history from the underside. . .
Thinking of St. Patrick's Day draws my mind to the lives of Irish immigrants to America in the nineteenth and early twentiety centuries. Telling the story of these folks seems important to me as I consider the challenges facing strangers, laboring people and newcomers, whoever they may be or whenever they arrive in the United States.
No one wrote history from "the underside" quite like the late Howard Zinn. I ran across the following interview as I was searching for material on Irish immigrants. I found important insights into Zinn's work and the discovery of the entire American story.
RL: A People's History of the United States is probably your best-known work. So many people who read the book have had their eyes opened, not only by the conclusions you reach but by your whole approach to history. Could you spell out what you mean by "people's history''?
HZ: I guess what I mean by a "people's history'' is basically two things. First, the content of history, which is different from traditional history in that I am telling of the lives of the people who are generally ignored by traditional history. For instance, the so-called great "economic miracle'' of the United States between the Civil War and World War 1, when the United States becomes an enormously powerful industrial nation--that's presented traditionally as a great and wonderful triumphal experience.
But left out of these traditional histories--it was very clear to me as I was studying both as an undergraduate and graduate student--was the experience of working people. Who were the people who worked for Rockefeller's refineries? Who were the people who worked on the transcontinental railroad? Who were the Chinese immigrants and Irish immigrants who died while working on the railroads. The girls in the textile mills of New England --going to work in the mills at the age of 12, dying at the age of 25--they were absent. I wanted to bring in these people.
The other thing is simply a point of view, simply to look at history with a different point of view, not just a different point of view in the academic sense, but very specifically to look at the events of American history from the point of view of people who have not had a voice, people who have been oppressed, and people whose struggles have not been noticed.
So I decided I wanted to tell the story of Columbus from the standpoint of the Indians that he encountered.
RL: Which is not the standard account.
HZ: And I wanted to tell the story of the Mexican War not just from the standpoint of the American soldiers who didn't know what they were doing, where they were going--many of them immigrants, desperate for a little money and a little attention--not only to tell the story from the standpoint of the GI's, which I wanted to do with every war, but also to tell the story from the standpoint of the so-called enemy, to see the Mexican War from the standpoint of the Mexicans--how "nice'' it is for them to have the United States take half their country as a result of the war and to commit atrocities in the course of it.
I wanted to tell the story of American history from the standpoint of women, Black people, Indians, of working people and of radicals and protesters.
As soon as I made that decision, it was clear this was going to be a different kind of history. And I have no doubt that the reason my book has reached so many people--to my surprise, actually, and certainly to the surprise of the publisher--is that people who read it were suddenly struck by the fact that I was telling American history from a very different viewpoint.
To read the entire interview click here.
No one wrote history from "the underside" quite like the late Howard Zinn. I ran across the following interview as I was searching for material on Irish immigrants. I found important insights into Zinn's work and the discovery of the entire American story.
RL: A People's History of the United States is probably your best-known work. So many people who read the book have had their eyes opened, not only by the conclusions you reach but by your whole approach to history. Could you spell out what you mean by "people's history''?
HZ: I guess what I mean by a "people's history'' is basically two things. First, the content of history, which is different from traditional history in that I am telling of the lives of the people who are generally ignored by traditional history. For instance, the so-called great "economic miracle'' of the United States between the Civil War and World War 1, when the United States becomes an enormously powerful industrial nation--that's presented traditionally as a great and wonderful triumphal experience.
But left out of these traditional histories--it was very clear to me as I was studying both as an undergraduate and graduate student--was the experience of working people. Who were the people who worked for Rockefeller's refineries? Who were the people who worked on the transcontinental railroad? Who were the Chinese immigrants and Irish immigrants who died while working on the railroads. The girls in the textile mills of New England --going to work in the mills at the age of 12, dying at the age of 25--they were absent. I wanted to bring in these people.
The other thing is simply a point of view, simply to look at history with a different point of view, not just a different point of view in the academic sense, but very specifically to look at the events of American history from the point of view of people who have not had a voice, people who have been oppressed, and people whose struggles have not been noticed.
So I decided I wanted to tell the story of Columbus from the standpoint of the Indians that he encountered.
RL: Which is not the standard account.
HZ: And I wanted to tell the story of the Mexican War not just from the standpoint of the American soldiers who didn't know what they were doing, where they were going--many of them immigrants, desperate for a little money and a little attention--not only to tell the story from the standpoint of the GI's, which I wanted to do with every war, but also to tell the story from the standpoint of the so-called enemy, to see the Mexican War from the standpoint of the Mexicans--how "nice'' it is for them to have the United States take half their country as a result of the war and to commit atrocities in the course of it.
I wanted to tell the story of American history from the standpoint of women, Black people, Indians, of working people and of radicals and protesters.
As soon as I made that decision, it was clear this was going to be a different kind of history. And I have no doubt that the reason my book has reached so many people--to my surprise, actually, and certainly to the surprise of the publisher--is that people who read it were suddenly struck by the fact that I was telling American history from a very different viewpoint.
To read the entire interview click here.
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Architectural messaging. . .
Recently, thanks to a most generous "program related investment" on the part of the Embrey Family Foundation, Central Dallas Ministries acquired a 3.6 acre tract of property at the southeast corner of Malcolm X Boulevard and Interstate 30.
We have big plans for the site that include the creation of scores of new livable wage jobs, a new health and wellness center, a gigantic food distribution center, a retail grocery store, teaching kitchens and a product exchange center and production facility leased to PepsiCo, another of our development partners in the project.
More details will follow here over the next few months.
In preparing for the design phase of the project, I sent the architects at OmiPlan a list of what I consider to be "design values." I framed them in terms of "what the new facilities must say to Dallas." See what you think of the list:
What the Center of Hope development must say to Dallas. . .
. . .the days of making apologies for being in S. Dallas/Fair Park are over.
. . . the people in this neighborhood are more than worth the highest class investment possible on this key property.
. . . this marks the renewal of an historic, but new, valuable, logical, strategic “gateway” into S. Dallas.
. . . it makes sense to invest significantly in this part of the city—many have said it, we choose to do it!
. . . the quality, style and aesthetic expression of this development make sense and really fit the community and its “soul.”
. . .this community deserves only the best possible effort.
. . . the health, well-being and economic stability and security of this community is of the utmost importance to the developers, tenants and owners of the development.
. . . the design of this development takes community input extremely seriously.
. . . the message conveyed by the facilities design will be more along the lines of economic development and enhancement than those of charity or philanthropy—in this project we are attempting to move far beyond charity to real community development.
. . . that hope resides in this place for any and all who seek it.
. . . the development will be neighborhood/community-centric rather than organization or corporate-centric.
. . . while efficiency will be a high priority, neighbor and customer friendly “welcoming” will trump every other consideration inside our budget.
We have big plans for the site that include the creation of scores of new livable wage jobs, a new health and wellness center, a gigantic food distribution center, a retail grocery store, teaching kitchens and a product exchange center and production facility leased to PepsiCo, another of our development partners in the project.
More details will follow here over the next few months.
In preparing for the design phase of the project, I sent the architects at OmiPlan a list of what I consider to be "design values." I framed them in terms of "what the new facilities must say to Dallas." See what you think of the list:
What the Center of Hope development must say to Dallas. . .
. . .the days of making apologies for being in S. Dallas/Fair Park are over.
. . . the people in this neighborhood are more than worth the highest class investment possible on this key property.
. . . this marks the renewal of an historic, but new, valuable, logical, strategic “gateway” into S. Dallas.
. . . it makes sense to invest significantly in this part of the city—many have said it, we choose to do it!
. . . the quality, style and aesthetic expression of this development make sense and really fit the community and its “soul.”
. . .this community deserves only the best possible effort.
. . . the health, well-being and economic stability and security of this community is of the utmost importance to the developers, tenants and owners of the development.
. . . the design of this development takes community input extremely seriously.
. . . the message conveyed by the facilities design will be more along the lines of economic development and enhancement than those of charity or philanthropy—in this project we are attempting to move far beyond charity to real community development.
. . . that hope resides in this place for any and all who seek it.
. . . the development will be neighborhood/community-centric rather than organization or corporate-centric.
. . . while efficiency will be a high priority, neighbor and customer friendly “welcoming” will trump every other consideration inside our budget.
Monday, March 15, 2010
Pew Report: Black children and poverty
What follows was published by the Economic Policy Institute.
Many people who spout off about poverty and how to overcome it have no real understanding of the pervasive and corrosive affect of dense poverty on the lives of children and their families.
Sobering data.
Business as usual charity won't move the needle on this social reality. This issue calls for bold, courageous public policy and consistent leadership to go with it.
October 7, 2009
By Joydeep Roy
Two out of every three black children born between 1985 and 2000 were raised in neighborhoods with at least a 20 percent poverty rate, compared with just 6 percent of white children, a new report from the Pew Foundation finds. These numbers are virtually unchanged from thirty years ago. Among children born between 1955 and 1970, 62 percent of black children were raised in neighborhoods with at least a 20 percent poverty rate, compared with only 4 percent of white children, according to the Pew report. This gap persists even when the poorest families are excluded from the analysis. Among children from the upper three income quintiles, almost half of black children -- 49% -- lived in high-poverty neighborhoods, defined as those with at least a 20% poverty rate. Only one percent of white children from the upper three income quintiles lived in high-poverty neighborhoods.
Too many children, particularly those from minority groups, are growing up in poor communities. While most studies of child poverty look at the direct impact on children living in poverty, research also shows that proximity to poverty can limit a child’s job and education prospects, even if that particular child is not poor. With research showing that reducing the concentration of poverty in their neighborhoods significantly affects children’s future, including their prospects in the labor market and their chances of upward mobility, policies that foster such changes should be a top priority.
Many people who spout off about poverty and how to overcome it have no real understanding of the pervasive and corrosive affect of dense poverty on the lives of children and their families.
Sobering data.
Business as usual charity won't move the needle on this social reality. This issue calls for bold, courageous public policy and consistent leadership to go with it.
Most black children grow up in neighborhoods with significant poverty
October 7, 2009
By Joydeep Roy
Two out of every three black children born between 1985 and 2000 were raised in neighborhoods with at least a 20 percent poverty rate, compared with just 6 percent of white children, a new report from the Pew Foundation finds. These numbers are virtually unchanged from thirty years ago. Among children born between 1955 and 1970, 62 percent of black children were raised in neighborhoods with at least a 20 percent poverty rate, compared with only 4 percent of white children, according to the Pew report. This gap persists even when the poorest families are excluded from the analysis. Among children from the upper three income quintiles, almost half of black children -- 49% -- lived in high-poverty neighborhoods, defined as those with at least a 20% poverty rate. Only one percent of white children from the upper three income quintiles lived in high-poverty neighborhoods.
Too many children, particularly those from minority groups, are growing up in poor communities. While most studies of child poverty look at the direct impact on children living in poverty, research also shows that proximity to poverty can limit a child’s job and education prospects, even if that particular child is not poor. With research showing that reducing the concentration of poverty in their neighborhoods significantly affects children’s future, including their prospects in the labor market and their chances of upward mobility, policies that foster such changes should be a top priority.
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Masters and Slaves in the House of the Lord
Several folks have inquired about the work I published regarding life for slave members of ante-bellum Mississippi and Louisiana Baptist churches.
To read a chapter published in Masters & Slaves in the House of the Lord: Race and Religion in the American South, 1740-1870, John B. Boles, editor, click here.
To read a chapter published in Masters & Slaves in the House of the Lord: Race and Religion in the American South, 1740-1870, John B. Boles, editor, click here.
Avoid "Social Justice Churches"
So, I suppose Moses, David, Amos, Micah, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Jesus and James would not be welcome at Glenn Beck's church, wherever that is, if it exists.
Amazing commentary. No wonder we have stalemate on so many policies in this nation.
Clearly, the words of scripture, read in every church including Beck's, deal with social and economic justice, the concerns of laboring people and a very real commitment to equity and to standing with the poor. Possibly, a branch of American Christianity now has decided to abandon this central part of the tradition and message of our faith. Such a heretical decision does not remove the truth from the Bible, but only from exposure to congregants who aren't allowed to hear the whole story for themselves. This one is really hard for me to understand.
Glenn Beck Urges Listeners to Leave Churches That Preach Social Justice
On his daily radio and television shows last week, Fox News personality Glenn Beck set out to convince his audience that "social justice," the term many Christian churches use to describe their efforts to address poverty and human rights, is a "code word" for communism and Nazism. Beck urged Christians to discuss the term with their priests and to leave their churches if leaders would not reconsider their emphasis on social justice.
"I'm begging you, your right to religion and freedom to exercise religion and read all of the passages of the Bible as you want to read them and as your church wants to preach them . . . are going to come under the ropes in the next year. If it lasts that long it will be the next year. I beg you, look for the words 'social justice' or 'economic justice' on your church Web site. If you find it, run as fast as you can. Social justice and economic justice, they are code words. Now, am I advising people to leave their church? Yes!"
To read more and listen to the audio click here.
Amazing commentary. No wonder we have stalemate on so many policies in this nation.
Clearly, the words of scripture, read in every church including Beck's, deal with social and economic justice, the concerns of laboring people and a very real commitment to equity and to standing with the poor. Possibly, a branch of American Christianity now has decided to abandon this central part of the tradition and message of our faith. Such a heretical decision does not remove the truth from the Bible, but only from exposure to congregants who aren't allowed to hear the whole story for themselves. This one is really hard for me to understand.
Glenn Beck Urges Listeners to Leave Churches That Preach Social Justice
On his daily radio and television shows last week, Fox News personality Glenn Beck set out to convince his audience that "social justice," the term many Christian churches use to describe their efforts to address poverty and human rights, is a "code word" for communism and Nazism. Beck urged Christians to discuss the term with their priests and to leave their churches if leaders would not reconsider their emphasis on social justice.
"I'm begging you, your right to religion and freedom to exercise religion and read all of the passages of the Bible as you want to read them and as your church wants to preach them . . . are going to come under the ropes in the next year. If it lasts that long it will be the next year. I beg you, look for the words 'social justice' or 'economic justice' on your church Web site. If you find it, run as fast as you can. Social justice and economic justice, they are code words. Now, am I advising people to leave their church? Yes!"
To read more and listen to the audio click here.
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Owen's first goal in his first soccer game
Owen Frazer is my grandson. He turns 4-years-old on May 7.
This morning he played in his first soccer game.
It was a blast!
Naturally, I had my camera along.
What you'll see in the clip here is Owen and his friends being little children.
You'll also see him score his first goal when he took the ball and dribbled to the goal. He is so laid back and kind. But he knew what to do with the ball when his chance came.
Forgive me, but I love it!
BTW--Owen wears #3 on his neon lime jersey!
This morning he played in his first soccer game.
It was a blast!
Naturally, I had my camera along.
What you'll see in the clip here is Owen and his friends being little children.
You'll also see him score his first goal when he took the ball and dribbled to the goal. He is so laid back and kind. But he knew what to do with the ball when his chance came.
Forgive me, but I love it!
BTW--Owen wears #3 on his neon lime jersey!
Friday, March 12, 2010
CityWalk@Akard: Photos
To get a glimpse of our newly restored, Downtown office tower, know at CityWalk@ Akard, click here.
The project is mixed-use: office and retail. . .
Mixed-income: 200 units of affordable housing with 50 units reserved for formerly homeless persons and 6 market rate, for sale condos.
Our grand opening will be Thursday, March 25 from 4:30 to 7:00 p.m.
The project is mixed-use: office and retail. . .
Mixed-income: 200 units of affordable housing with 50 units reserved for formerly homeless persons and 6 market rate, for sale condos.
Our grand opening will be Thursday, March 25 from 4:30 to 7:00 p.m.
Wealth keeps moving upward. . .
The chart above pretty well sums up economic reality in the United States these days. Poverty, personal and family options and equity are all shaped by this report. The chart comes with the following report from the Economic Policy Institute.
Here's what the report reveals:
Where has all the income gone? Look up.
March 3, 2010
By Lawrence Mishel
The 400 American households with the highest incomes also have enjoyed a much faster pace of income growth than the vast majority. And, because tax rates applied to their income have fallen by a third, their after-tax incomes grew substantially faster than their pre-tax incomes. The figure looks at inflation-adjusted pre-tax and after-tax income growth for the 400 top-income families between 1992 and 2007, based on new data recently released by the Internal Revenue Service. It shows that while pre-tax income grew by a staggering 409% over that 15-year period, after-tax income increased even more, by 476%.
The third line in the figure offers some perspective by showing the change in the pre-tax median household income over the same period, which grew just 13.2%. The median pre-tax household income for a family of four in 2007 was $50,233, while the top-earning 400 households earned a median $345 million, almost 6900 times as much income. In contrast, in 1992 the ratio was just a sixth as large, with the top 400 households having 1124 times as much income.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Advocacy and Non-Proifts
Interesting report from Philanthropy News Digest and the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy on non-profit organizations and advocacy in the public sector. Important topic.
For sure, business as usual approaches no longer work.
As always, I'd love your feedback.
LA Nonprofits Involved in Advocacy Provide Significant Community Benefits, Report Finds
Between 2004 and 2008, Los Angeles County nonprofits engaged in advocacy and organizing generated nearly $7 billion in benefits for local residents, a new report from the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy finds.
Based on a study of fifteen nonprofits in the county, the report, Strengthening Democracy, Increasing Opportunities: Impacts of Advocacy, Organizing and Civic Engagement in Los Angeles County (76 pages, PDF), found that every dollar foundations and other donors provided to community organizations engaged in advocacy and organizing generated $91 in benefits for the communities they serve. Over the five-year study period, those benefits included $2.6 billion in higher wages, $2.2 billion in healthcare savings, and more than $2 billion from the increased use of public transit, construction of new schools, and expanded affordable housing. The report also looked at non-monetized benefits provided by the groups, including the protection of voting rights, improved working conditions, and expanded service delivery to marginalized populations.
Based on the findings, the report recommends that foundations increase their support for advocacy and organizing, help educate donors about the benefits of advocacy funding, support effective collaboration among community organizations, collaborate with other grantmakers to leverage resources, and invest in the infrastructure and organizational capacity of grassroots organizations over sustained periods of time.
"While high-profile commentators decry 'community organizing,' this report clearly demonstrates that such activity delivers enormous benefits to communities," said NCRP executive director Aaron Dorfman. "On every issue of concern to residents of Los Angeles County, from clean air to immigration, from equality to education, foundation support for community-based activist organizations yields positive results. Foundation support turns indifference into democracy, and the benefits of a thriving democracy are indeed substantial."
“Nonprofits Bring Tremendous Benefits to Communities Through Citizen Involvement in Politics.” National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy Press Release 3/02/10.
For sure, business as usual approaches no longer work.
As always, I'd love your feedback.
LA Nonprofits Involved in Advocacy Provide Significant Community Benefits, Report Finds
Between 2004 and 2008, Los Angeles County nonprofits engaged in advocacy and organizing generated nearly $7 billion in benefits for local residents, a new report from the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy finds.
Based on a study of fifteen nonprofits in the county, the report, Strengthening Democracy, Increasing Opportunities: Impacts of Advocacy, Organizing and Civic Engagement in Los Angeles County (76 pages, PDF), found that every dollar foundations and other donors provided to community organizations engaged in advocacy and organizing generated $91 in benefits for the communities they serve. Over the five-year study period, those benefits included $2.6 billion in higher wages, $2.2 billion in healthcare savings, and more than $2 billion from the increased use of public transit, construction of new schools, and expanded affordable housing. The report also looked at non-monetized benefits provided by the groups, including the protection of voting rights, improved working conditions, and expanded service delivery to marginalized populations.
Based on the findings, the report recommends that foundations increase their support for advocacy and organizing, help educate donors about the benefits of advocacy funding, support effective collaboration among community organizations, collaborate with other grantmakers to leverage resources, and invest in the infrastructure and organizational capacity of grassroots organizations over sustained periods of time.
"While high-profile commentators decry 'community organizing,' this report clearly demonstrates that such activity delivers enormous benefits to communities," said NCRP executive director Aaron Dorfman. "On every issue of concern to residents of Los Angeles County, from clean air to immigration, from equality to education, foundation support for community-based activist organizations yields positive results. Foundation support turns indifference into democracy, and the benefits of a thriving democracy are indeed substantial."
“Nonprofits Bring Tremendous Benefits to Communities Through Citizen Involvement in Politics.” National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy Press Release 3/02/10.
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Live United. . .worth watching
The United Way of Metropolitan Dallas (UWMD) is moving through a complete organizational "re-invention" with the objective to provide higher impact services, advocacy and community engagement than ever before in its history.
I can say this with great confidence because I've been in on some of the work that has been going on now for about three years.
UWMD holds up a brilliant new model in its simple, but profound call to "Live United!"
Inviting donors to donate, advocate and volunteer, UWMD throws down a comprehensive challenge to corporations and their employees to get involved as never before in the life of our region.
Turning to service providers and community organizations like Central Dallas Ministries, UWMD challenges us to refine our focus to concentrate on three major areas of concern as we do our work: Education, Income and Health. In addition, UWMD has set aside funding for "basic human needs" that arise from the current economic realities of our area and from emergency situations.
One more major policy shift that marks a sea change at Untied Way is the fact that next year any non-profit organization in the community can submit a grant for funding. The process will be wide open to any group with a great idea and the ability to drive positive, measureable outcomes.
Working with Gary Godsey, President/CEO of UWMD, his team and all of our colleagues is a real privilege. But, the best days remain ahead of us.
So today, I applaud the work of our United Way!
To gain more insight into the new world of UWMD click here.
I can say this with great confidence because I've been in on some of the work that has been going on now for about three years.
UWMD holds up a brilliant new model in its simple, but profound call to "Live United!"
Inviting donors to donate, advocate and volunteer, UWMD throws down a comprehensive challenge to corporations and their employees to get involved as never before in the life of our region.
Turning to service providers and community organizations like Central Dallas Ministries, UWMD challenges us to refine our focus to concentrate on three major areas of concern as we do our work: Education, Income and Health. In addition, UWMD has set aside funding for "basic human needs" that arise from the current economic realities of our area and from emergency situations.
One more major policy shift that marks a sea change at Untied Way is the fact that next year any non-profit organization in the community can submit a grant for funding. The process will be wide open to any group with a great idea and the ability to drive positive, measureable outcomes.
Working with Gary Godsey, President/CEO of UWMD, his team and all of our colleagues is a real privilege. But, the best days remain ahead of us.
So today, I applaud the work of our United Way!
To gain more insight into the new world of UWMD click here.
Tuesday, March 09, 2010
CityWalk@Akard Grand Opening
Speaking of Permanent Supportive Housing. . .check out information regarding the Grand Opening for our CityWalk@ Akard project right here.
15th Annual Urban Ministries Prayer Breakfast
Central Dallas Ministries invites you to join us for our 15th Annual Urban Ministries Prayer Breakfast on Tuesday, April 6, 2010, at The Fairmont Dallas (for regular participants please note new location this year!).
Keynote speaker this year will be Rosanne Haggerty, President and Founder of Common Ground, a leader in developing permanent supportive housing for extremely poor homeless persons.
Haggerty is an Urban Advisor to the Urban Land Institute, a board member of the Center for Urban Community Services, the Citizen’s Housing and Planning Council, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) and Quest Diagnostics, and is a Life Trustee of Amherst College.
Prior to founding Common Ground Community in 1990, she was the coordinator of housing development at Brooklyn Catholic Charities. Haggerty comes to the table with over 20 years of experience as an international leader in developing community strategies to end homelessness. She is a graduate of Amherst College and is completing studies for a PhD in sociology at New York University. Ms. Haggerty is a 2001 MacArthur Foundation Fellow. In 2007, she was elected as an Ashoka Senior Fellow.
Following the breakfast event, a special discussion will continue as we provide important time and space for a discussion of the need in Dallas for the development of more permanent supportive housing (PSH) that utilizes a "housing first" approach.
In addition, tours will be available of citywalk@ akard, Central Dallas Ministries' and Central Dallas Community Development Corporation's new PSH and affordable housing development located at 511 N. Akard, just up the street from the Fairmont Hotel.
For more information on sponsorships, table reservations and tickets, call 214.823.8710 extension 2138 or 214.303.2138 and ask to speak with Lisa Goolsby.
We are confident that this year's event will inspire the community, advance a conversation about how to end chronic homelessness in Dallas and encourage us all to work together as never before.
Help me spread the word about the breakfast in your world!
Keynote speaker this year will be Rosanne Haggerty, President and Founder of Common Ground, a leader in developing permanent supportive housing for extremely poor homeless persons.
Haggerty is an Urban Advisor to the Urban Land Institute, a board member of the Center for Urban Community Services, the Citizen’s Housing and Planning Council, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) and Quest Diagnostics, and is a Life Trustee of Amherst College.
Prior to founding Common Ground Community in 1990, she was the coordinator of housing development at Brooklyn Catholic Charities. Haggerty comes to the table with over 20 years of experience as an international leader in developing community strategies to end homelessness. She is a graduate of Amherst College and is completing studies for a PhD in sociology at New York University. Ms. Haggerty is a 2001 MacArthur Foundation Fellow. In 2007, she was elected as an Ashoka Senior Fellow.
Following the breakfast event, a special discussion will continue as we provide important time and space for a discussion of the need in Dallas for the development of more permanent supportive housing (PSH) that utilizes a "housing first" approach.
In addition, tours will be available of citywalk@ akard, Central Dallas Ministries' and Central Dallas Community Development Corporation's new PSH and affordable housing development located at 511 N. Akard, just up the street from the Fairmont Hotel.
For more information on sponsorships, table reservations and tickets, call 214.823.8710 extension 2138 or 214.303.2138 and ask to speak with Lisa Goolsby.
We are confident that this year's event will inspire the community, advance a conversation about how to end chronic homelessness in Dallas and encourage us all to work together as never before.
Help me spread the word about the breakfast in your world!
Monday, March 08, 2010
Check out our latest on-line magazine. . .
Thanks to the creative assistance of Pursuant, our high-tech, over-the-top, communications partner, Central Dallas Ministries shares stories and makes introductions to some of the amazing people we know who experience transformation and renewal through their own hard work and determination.
The format of our e-magazine makes for easy viewing, while providing lots of information to those who view each issue.
I hope you'll take a look today!
To review Central Dallas Ministries' latest on-line, e-magazine, click here.
The format of our e-magazine makes for easy viewing, while providing lots of information to those who view each issue.
I hope you'll take a look today!
To review Central Dallas Ministries' latest on-line, e-magazine, click here.
Sunday, March 07, 2010
The sin of Sodom and the New York Times
So now comes Nicholas D. Kristof, columnist for The New York Times, to instruct us all on the values of the Kingdom of God as over against those who often spouted by religious types from pulpits and across electronic media airwaves.
Tell me what you think.
Learning From the Sin of Sodom
Published: February 27, 2010
Nicholas D. Kristof
For most of the last century, save-the-worlders were primarily Democrats and liberals. In contrast, many Republicans and religious conservatives denounced government aid programs, with Senator Jesse Helms calling them “money down a rat hole.”
Over the last decade, however, that divide has dissolved, in ways that many Americans haven’t noticed or appreciated. Evangelicals have become the new internationalists, pushing successfully for new American programs against AIDS and malaria, and doing superb work on issues from human trafficking in India to mass rape in Congo.
A pop quiz: What’s the largest U.S.-based international relief and development organization?
It’s not Save the Children, and it’s not CARE — both terrific secular organizations. Rather, it’s World Vision, a Seattle-based Christian organization (with strong evangelical roots) whose budget has roughly tripled over the last decade.
World Vision now has 40,000 staff members in nearly 100 countries. That’s more staff members than CARE, Save the Children and the worldwide operations of the United States Agency for International Development — combined.
A growing number of conservative Christians are explicitly and self-critically acknowledging that to be “pro-life” must mean more than opposing abortion. The head of World Vision in the United States, Richard Stearns, begins his fascinating book, “The Hole in Our Gospel,” with an account of a visit a decade ago to Uganda, where he met a 13-year-old AIDS orphan who was raising his younger brothers by himself.
“What sickened me most was this question: where was the Church?” he writes. “Where were the followers of Jesus Christ in the midst of perhaps the greatest humanitarian crisis of our time? Surely the Church should have been caring for these ‘orphans and widows in their distress.’ (James 1:27). Shouldn’t the pulpits across America have flamed with exhortations to rush to the front lines of compassion?
“How have we missed it so tragically, when even rock stars and Hollywood actors seem to understand?”
To read the entire essay and to get to the part about Sodom click here.
Tell me what you think.
Learning From the Sin of Sodom
Published: February 27, 2010
Nicholas D. Kristof
For most of the last century, save-the-worlders were primarily Democrats and liberals. In contrast, many Republicans and religious conservatives denounced government aid programs, with Senator Jesse Helms calling them “money down a rat hole.”
Over the last decade, however, that divide has dissolved, in ways that many Americans haven’t noticed or appreciated. Evangelicals have become the new internationalists, pushing successfully for new American programs against AIDS and malaria, and doing superb work on issues from human trafficking in India to mass rape in Congo.
A pop quiz: What’s the largest U.S.-based international relief and development organization?
It’s not Save the Children, and it’s not CARE — both terrific secular organizations. Rather, it’s World Vision, a Seattle-based Christian organization (with strong evangelical roots) whose budget has roughly tripled over the last decade.
World Vision now has 40,000 staff members in nearly 100 countries. That’s more staff members than CARE, Save the Children and the worldwide operations of the United States Agency for International Development — combined.
A growing number of conservative Christians are explicitly and self-critically acknowledging that to be “pro-life” must mean more than opposing abortion. The head of World Vision in the United States, Richard Stearns, begins his fascinating book, “The Hole in Our Gospel,” with an account of a visit a decade ago to Uganda, where he met a 13-year-old AIDS orphan who was raising his younger brothers by himself.
“What sickened me most was this question: where was the Church?” he writes. “Where were the followers of Jesus Christ in the midst of perhaps the greatest humanitarian crisis of our time? Surely the Church should have been caring for these ‘orphans and widows in their distress.’ (James 1:27). Shouldn’t the pulpits across America have flamed with exhortations to rush to the front lines of compassion?
“How have we missed it so tragically, when even rock stars and Hollywood actors seem to understand?”
To read the entire essay and to get to the part about Sodom click here.
Friday, March 05, 2010
Students need relief. . .
What with the way things appear to be unfolding (or not!) in Washington these days, the chances of Congress tackling comprehensive immigration reform this year seem slim to none.
Still millions of immigrant children brought to the US by their parents when they were still minors continue to find themselves in "status limbo." Hard working, diligent, eager and hopeful, millions of these youth need the benefit of legislation like the various versions of the DREAM Act that we've discussed here on numerous occasions. [If you are interested, type "DREAM Act" and "Monica" in search tool above left.]
Juan's story in the video clip below touched me again concerning the plight of some really great human beings. What does faith have to say to us about Juan?
Still millions of immigrant children brought to the US by their parents when they were still minors continue to find themselves in "status limbo." Hard working, diligent, eager and hopeful, millions of these youth need the benefit of legislation like the various versions of the DREAM Act that we've discussed here on numerous occasions. [If you are interested, type "DREAM Act" and "Monica" in search tool above left.]
Juan's story in the video clip below touched me again concerning the plight of some really great human beings. What does faith have to say to us about Juan?
Thursday, March 04, 2010
Reflections on "the game" as Spring Training 2010 begins. . .(Part 4)
[What follows is the conclusion of an essay written while I coached an inner-city baseball team in the Texas Rangers Rookie League. For Parts 1-3, see my posts on the last 3 days.]
Economic Disparity and America's "New Economy." Observing John's world reveals that the use, trade and delivery of illegal narcotics involve not only serious criminal, health and addiction issues, but crucial market issues as well. The drug trade in Dallas promises (actually one of urban America's most tragic lies) to provide the highest income possible to persons whose limited skills mark them out for a life to be scratched out well below the poverty line. When faced with the option of taking a job that pays just above minimum wage or becoming a player in the illicit drug industry that promises to pay much more, many people, especially young people, chose the more dangerous route.
While I am not attempting to relieve anyone of personal responsibility, the fact remains that the teens and adults in John's house do not possess the skills needed to compete in America's "new economy." Our community has the will to support the revolving door, created by our criminal justice system that shuffles adults in and out of John's world. Evidently, what we lack is the will to adequately fund training programs that could provide real economic options for these same teens and adults. Add the powerful factor of addiction to the mix and we create a recipe for social destruction, one person, one family and one neighborhood at a time.
[When I wrote this essay, Dallas corporations were crying for qualified employees, especially in the technology sector. The need was so great that immigration policies were being reformed and relaxed to accommodate the need for foreign workers who could fill the need quickly. The economic bust of 2008 changed all of that, but the need for livable wage employment skills for our citizens remains very urgent.]
The mental leap necessary to move from coaching in a summer youth baseball league to a discussion of drugs, crime, the state of public education, employment training and market-driven economic options may seem strange or even strained.
But not if you know my buddy John.
He lives in the tough world of inner city Dallas.
As a result, I estimate that John has possibly two more years of semi-innocence before he faces some very tough choices forced on him by the circumstances of his world. If he takes the wrong turn, he likely will end up repeating the mistakes of his older family members.
Fortunately, John has a number of friends in the neighborhood who are committed to staying near him to help navigate these critical times of decision. Not every Dallas child in his position possesses his small advantage.
Since serving as his coach, I know I will never be able to watch a baseball game in the same way again. From sandlot to second grade Little Leagure, the game has always been very special to me. Now I think I know how I'll occupy many of my thoughts during the slow, steady progress of America's game.
[Eight years after I first wrote this reflection, I am pleased to report that John graduated high school, went on to college and served last summer on our AmeriCorps team. I expect that he will graduate with his degree in about two more years. Would that John's story could be repeated across urban America a million times over.]
Economic Disparity and America's "New Economy." Observing John's world reveals that the use, trade and delivery of illegal narcotics involve not only serious criminal, health and addiction issues, but crucial market issues as well. The drug trade in Dallas promises (actually one of urban America's most tragic lies) to provide the highest income possible to persons whose limited skills mark them out for a life to be scratched out well below the poverty line. When faced with the option of taking a job that pays just above minimum wage or becoming a player in the illicit drug industry that promises to pay much more, many people, especially young people, chose the more dangerous route.
While I am not attempting to relieve anyone of personal responsibility, the fact remains that the teens and adults in John's house do not possess the skills needed to compete in America's "new economy." Our community has the will to support the revolving door, created by our criminal justice system that shuffles adults in and out of John's world. Evidently, what we lack is the will to adequately fund training programs that could provide real economic options for these same teens and adults. Add the powerful factor of addiction to the mix and we create a recipe for social destruction, one person, one family and one neighborhood at a time.
[When I wrote this essay, Dallas corporations were crying for qualified employees, especially in the technology sector. The need was so great that immigration policies were being reformed and relaxed to accommodate the need for foreign workers who could fill the need quickly. The economic bust of 2008 changed all of that, but the need for livable wage employment skills for our citizens remains very urgent.]
The mental leap necessary to move from coaching in a summer youth baseball league to a discussion of drugs, crime, the state of public education, employment training and market-driven economic options may seem strange or even strained.
But not if you know my buddy John.
He lives in the tough world of inner city Dallas.
As a result, I estimate that John has possibly two more years of semi-innocence before he faces some very tough choices forced on him by the circumstances of his world. If he takes the wrong turn, he likely will end up repeating the mistakes of his older family members.
Fortunately, John has a number of friends in the neighborhood who are committed to staying near him to help navigate these critical times of decision. Not every Dallas child in his position possesses his small advantage.
Since serving as his coach, I know I will never be able to watch a baseball game in the same way again. From sandlot to second grade Little Leagure, the game has always been very special to me. Now I think I know how I'll occupy many of my thoughts during the slow, steady progress of America's game.
[Eight years after I first wrote this reflection, I am pleased to report that John graduated high school, went on to college and served last summer on our AmeriCorps team. I expect that he will graduate with his degree in about two more years. Would that John's story could be repeated across urban America a million times over.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



















