Marian Wright Edelman's Child Watch ColumnJune 4, 2005
CHILDREN ARE MORE THAN THEIR TESTS
I talked recently with a Black grandmother with a second grade grandson who asked me to pray for him. He was in the middle of testing for the week in his exclusive private school and was stressed out. A smart child, she feared he might not be the quickest responder on the tests and thought the week long process was a lot of pressure for such a young child. He and she felt extra pressure because he was the only Black child in the room and she did not want him to feel or appear to be dumb if he didn't do as well as his privileged White peers.
So many children are weighed down by the expectations and needs of adults - good and bad. Parents, teachers and administrators need to have high expectations for all children, but they also need to be mindful of trying to judge children's intelligence and talents just on the basis of tests or fit our children into a single label, simple box, and the convenience of school systems. Schools exist to teach and help children learn and develop the whole self: mind, body and spirit. Appropriate tests should identify children's strengths and weaknesses in order to better help not stigmatize them.
I strongly support holding schools accountable for educating every child and support the disaggregation of children's academic progress by race and income. But the do or die testing underway under the No Child Left Behind Act is causing many children great harm.
Too many schools are teaching to the tests rather than teaching to the child. Too many educators are over labeling children as special needs children to exempt them from regular testing procedures so their school will look better. Too many children are being retained in a grade without getting the extra help they need which increases the risk of them dropping out of school and puts them at greater risk of being sucked into the prison pipeline. And too many schools are transmitting their fears of being labeled a failing school if children don't do well on the tests by pushing them out of school for behaviors that are often a cry for help.
We need to remember that each child is an individual. Policymakers, parents and teachers need to see and respect the various ways and paces children learn and develop even as we try to make sure that they gain all the basic competencies they need to succeed in life. Reading , computing, writing and thinking are crucial, but creativity and different talents in our children must also be honored.
I love a wonderful parable I first read in a book by the distinguished Black theologian Howard Thurman that I found again in an Outward Bound reader.
"Once upon a time, the animals decided they must do something heroic to meet the problems of a 'new world.' So they organized a school. They adopted an activity curriculum consisting of running, climbing, swimming and flying. To make it easier to administer the curriculum, all the animals took all the subjects.
The duck was excellent n swimming, in fact better than his instructor, but he made only passing grades in flying and was very poor in running. Since he was slow in running, he had to stay after school and also drop swimming in order to practice running. This was kept up until his web feet were badly worn and he was only average in swimming. But average was acceptable in school, so nobody worried about that except the duck.
The rabbit started at the top of the class in running, but had a nervous breakdown because of so much make-up work in swimming.
The squirrel was excellent in climbing until he developed frustration in the flying class, where his teacher made him start from the ground up instead of from the treetop down. He also developed 'charlie horses' from overexertion and got C in climbing and D in running.
The eagle was a problem child and was disciplined severely. In the climbing class he beat all the others to the top of the tree, but insisted on using his own way to get there.
At the end of the year an abnormal eel that could swim exceedingly well, and also run, climb, and fly a little, had the highest average and was valedictorian.
The prairie dogs stayed out of school and fought the tax levy because the administration would not add digging and burrowing to the curriculum. They apprenticed their child to a badger and later joined the groundhog and gophers to start a successful private school."
Is there a lesson here for how we treat our children in too many schools?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marian Wright Edelman is President and Founder of the Children's Defense Fund and its Action Council whose Leave No Child Behind® mission strives to ensure every child a Healthy Start, a Head Start, a Fair Start, a Safe Start, and a Moral Start in life and successful passage to adulthood with the help of caring families and communities. Visit www.childrensdefense.org.
6 comments:
Help me understand something: what motivated you to use the discriptive "Black" so much?
A BLACK grandmother...
the only BLACK kid in his class... Great parable by a BLACK man...
This RED guy (1/8 Indian, 7/8 sunburn) thinks it is getting old.
By the way, I did enjoy the parable. I think it illustrated quite well some of the disconnect in our education system today.
I just wonder if people will tune out the core of your great content because of the clearly race-centric slant you've taken in writing it?
Larry did not write it. Marian Wright Edelman did. She is a black woman herself.
http://www.nwhp.org/tlp/biographies/edelman/bio.html
Larry,
I could not agree more in regards to too many teachers in our country teaching to the test and leaving the child to fend for themselves. In Texas especially, there is too much stock put into the standardized testing. I am a young woman who always performed low on certain skills in standardized tests, but could perform highly when evaluated without the pressure of these tools. I for one believe like you, that the well-being and development of the child is of utmost importance. They will not remember tests, they will remember teachers, administrators, parents, and friends that took the time to cultivate in them confidence, faith, hope, and most importantly love of themselves and others.
Here are a few output figures that do not require standardized tests, and yet which indicate success on the part of the school:
1. % of students who graduate (which is a surface level measure of how successfully the schools keep kids engaged in their own education)
2. % of students under 16 who are truant (similar to above)
3. % of graduates pursuing advanced education within 4 years of graduation (which is a surface level measure of how successfully the schools prepared kids for advanced education)
4. % of graduates who are either employed or enrolled in a full-time school within one year of graduation (which is a surface level measure of how well the schools prepared kids for life)
All of these can be measured without standardized tests. They also indicate a greater level of success than those tests: kids can score well and yet still feel totally disengaged from their education, uninterested in college, disheartened and hopeless when thinking about a career, etc.
It is a shame that school administrators do not think about the longitudinal impact of their programs on kids. Since their salaries/bonuses/employment rely on test scores, that is all they care about.
As taxpayers, we invest our funds in these schools. What is it that we are buying? Are we buying high test scores?
I would like to think that we are buying a stronger workforce, a more educated public, a more engaged community and a healthier populace.
If we have to issue tests to gauge this, then why test on matters that are unrelated to all of these? I would be much more interested in knowing:
% of students who know how to balance their checking account
% of students who have completed a career plan for themselves, including benchmarks and a timeline
% of students who understand how to read a lease for an apartment, how to buy a house, how to secure a loan for college or a business, etc.
% of students who maintain good physical health (can include everything from awareness of basic medical/dental services available to them, to nutritional awareness, to understanding of the importance of exercise, etc.)
% of students who volunteer in their community (community involvement is inversely related to crime, which thrives in areas where there is no genuine community)
These are real measures of success. I would hope that our schools aspire to a higher level.
Jeremy,
You have a lot of good measurements that are probably more indicative than standardized tests. But they're almost exclusively practically focused. Even for students that don't go on to college, school should teach them to think critically. Ideally, it would expose them to higher-level ideas and language, but at the very least, we need people to be able to individually evalute the marketing/campaigning we're saturated with.
Often, when the societal purpose of education is discussed, it becomes purely economic, but life is so much more (i.e., Larry's HeronDance post). From what I've seen of the posters here, I don't think most would disagree.
Until you walk a mile in someone's shoes, you shouldn't judge or criticize.
The reason why we have turned to schools being more accountable is because too many children were moved through the system without actually acquiring the skills they needed to function in the real world. The challenge is balancing high academic expectations and accountability with the importance of educating the whole child.
Administrators and teachers do not want to focus entirely on standardized test scores. If we want to be viewed as a successful school, or district, this is one of the many variables that we are judged.
The idea is that we test to teach, not teach to test. Data drives instruction in order to meet the needs of individual students.
I will end like I began, "Until you walk a mile...." When was the last time you spent time in a Primary or Intermediate school? Get involved. Volunteer. Parents, students, teachers, administrators and the community must work together.
Then and only then will there be "No Child Left Behind".
Post a Comment